1,3 Мб, 1119x1360The “Holy Roman Empire” didn’t exist. Instead there was peak-medieval disunity of many small nations. It was one of the most stereotypical medieval environments. And it was all pagan and extremely diverse of verity of community. And significantly in amazing total war where peasants often won, thus the stories were feared by parasites and intentionally forgotten.
The lie called “Священная Римская империя” is an aggressive slander campaign to try to invalidate a heart of Europe and so many nations of immense history. Much of the history of the many good nations was intentionally destroyed. Some people fear Europeans, hence the lie.
Similar to the attempt to say that Charlemagne created France when the Franks (another word for Gaul) already existed and the many Queens had the Franks/French already truly unified instead of suppressed.
Notice how huge the gaps are in history where people pretend nothing happened for hundreds of years. Some people fear girls.
The lie called “Священная Римская империя” is an aggressive slander campaign to try to invalidate a heart of Europe and so many nations of immense history. Much of the history of the many good nations was intentionally destroyed. Some people fear Europeans, hence the lie.
Similar to the attempt to say that Charlemagne created France when the Franks (another word for Gaul) already existed and the many Queens had the Franks/French already truly unified instead of suppressed.
Notice how huge the gaps are in history where people pretend nothing happened for hundreds of years. Some people fear girls.
2 135950
3 135963lol
93 Кб, 564x791
4 136010Byzantium was a marvellous & pagan republic.
The Christians and monarchies are some trite that caused the immediate downfall. Vastly most of the history was intentionally destroyed by the Christians/parasites. The monarchies never truly ruled the true nation. The true people of the land immediately let the Ottomans into the gates. The true people of the land were significant to why the Ottomans thrived so much. Honestly the Ottomans are a pagan force. Islam was typically used as trolling to counter Christians.
The Christians and monarchies are some trite that caused the immediate downfall. Vastly most of the history was intentionally destroyed by the Christians/parasites. The monarchies never truly ruled the true nation. The true people of the land immediately let the Ottomans into the gates. The true people of the land were significant to why the Ottomans thrived so much. Honestly the Ottomans are a pagan force. Islam was typically used as trolling to counter Christians.
2,2 Мб, 4592x3056 5 136015Much of Nippon relations with Christians is a myth.
Europeans immediately warned the Nippon about the Christians. The Dutch committed to huge total war upon the Christians. Dutch armies immensely helped the Tokugawa in battles opposing Christians and helped crucify. The Dutch committed one of the most radical anti-Christian wars ever. The Dutch fleets bombarded and obliterated anyone with the slightest association to Christians. Nonetheless, Nippon “Christians” were mostly just vulnerable people interested in a “religion” they thought was European, purely out of interest in Europeans. Nippon had no idea it’s not a European religion and had no idea about the racist nonsense & genocidal nonsense & apocalypse nonsense & soul-slavery nonsense within the bible, only learning generic quotes not more enlightening than Yin-Yang.
The story of the Taiping Rebellion is somewhat similar beyond it being mostly a blatant lie that any of it had anything to do with Christianity. It was many simultaneous wars about South Chinese with South Chinese religion wanting independence from the Manchu, not a few misappropriated quotes from one person who had little to do with the massive conflict.
Europeans immediately warned the Nippon about the Christians. The Dutch committed to huge total war upon the Christians. Dutch armies immensely helped the Tokugawa in battles opposing Christians and helped crucify. The Dutch committed one of the most radical anti-Christian wars ever. The Dutch fleets bombarded and obliterated anyone with the slightest association to Christians. Nonetheless, Nippon “Christians” were mostly just vulnerable people interested in a “religion” they thought was European, purely out of interest in Europeans. Nippon had no idea it’s not a European religion and had no idea about the racist nonsense & genocidal nonsense & apocalypse nonsense & soul-slavery nonsense within the bible, only learning generic quotes not more enlightening than Yin-Yang.
The story of the Taiping Rebellion is somewhat similar beyond it being mostly a blatant lie that any of it had anything to do with Christianity. It was many simultaneous wars about South Chinese with South Chinese religion wanting independence from the Manchu, not a few misappropriated quotes from one person who had little to do with the massive conflict.
319 Кб, 850x815 6 136016Most of Russias defeats versus the mongols were because of the Christians. Russians often purposely opened the gates of cities to the mongols and Russian armies surrendered to the mongols because the Christians treated the Russians worse. Russians significantly helped the Mongols win further victories and stay in power.
Russia only was able to expand to the east because of strength of Russian nationalism/paganism.
Russias long struggle with the mongols was significantly a struggle of opposing Christianity. We can also see how similarly Christianity exacerbated the Ukraine war and harmed societal quality enough that so many verities of decay & disaster happened.
Likewise Europeans only were able to push back various Middle-Eastern armies via pagan armies. Long periods of struggle were merely Christian armies constantly losing while the pagans helped the MiddleEasterners. We can see that in plenty of so called “Holy-wars” there is actually European nations that were allied to the Middle-Easterners.
Russia only was able to expand to the east because of strength of Russian nationalism/paganism.
Russias long struggle with the mongols was significantly a struggle of opposing Christianity. We can also see how similarly Christianity exacerbated the Ukraine war and harmed societal quality enough that so many verities of decay & disaster happened.
Likewise Europeans only were able to push back various Middle-Eastern armies via pagan armies. Long periods of struggle were merely Christian armies constantly losing while the pagans helped the MiddleEasterners. We can see that in plenty of so called “Holy-wars” there is actually European nations that were allied to the Middle-Easterners.
7 136099>>6016
Rus is a Roman/Christian invention. Most of Russia problems at the came from long time of disunion and infighting between knyaz's first and foremost, in the face of a threat that's anything but.
No, it expanded primarily due to sheer willpower, grit, intellect, cunning and eventually those resulted in the Grand Principality of Moscow unifying Russia.
[Citations needed.] Christianity and Russia is a 50/50 topic.
Ukrainian war is not waged by Christians at all. Ukraine is a CIA spook plant slash shop slash warehouse nation, its non-secessionist traditional Christian elements are against betrayal of fellows, and against war as true Christians are against spilling blood without acceptably just recourse.
Secessionist Ukrainian Christian Church has betrayed the ideals.
Military might is not a function of theological denomination.
It is inadequate to assess military actions on such surface level assumptions.
Because they share mythos interests.
>Most of Russias defeats versus the mongols were because of the Christians.
Rus is a Roman/Christian invention. Most of Russia problems at the came from long time of disunion and infighting between knyaz's first and foremost, in the face of a threat that's anything but.
>Russia only was able to expand to the east because of strength of Russian nationalism/paganism.
No, it expanded primarily due to sheer willpower, grit, intellect, cunning and eventually those resulted in the Grand Principality of Moscow unifying Russia.
>Russias long struggle with the mongols was significantly a struggle of opposing Christianity.
[Citations needed.] Christianity and Russia is a 50/50 topic.
>We can also see how similarly Christianity exacerbated the Ukraine war and harmed societal quality enough that so many verities of decay & disaster happened.
Ukrainian war is not waged by Christians at all. Ukraine is a CIA spook plant slash shop slash warehouse nation, its non-secessionist traditional Christian elements are against betrayal of fellows, and against war as true Christians are against spilling blood without acceptably just recourse.
Secessionist Ukrainian Christian Church has betrayed the ideals.
>Likewise Europeans only were able to push back various Middle-Eastern armies via pagan armies.
Military might is not a function of theological denomination.
>Long periods of struggle were merely Christian armies constantly losing while the pagans helped the MiddleEasterners.
It is inadequate to assess military actions on such surface level assumptions.
>We can see that in plenty of so called “Holy-wars” there is actually European nations that were allied to the Middle-Easterners.
Because they share mythos interests.